The Daily Caller was built to be a conservative newsroom. Over the past eighteen months, it has turned into something else: a publication that sells its readers a corrosive proposition about Israel and the people who support it: that Israel exploits America, and that its supporters compromise American interests.
This isn’t a stray column or a rogue contributor. It’s an intentional editorial decision, carried by the outlet’s top brass, its opinion columnists and its news reporters alike. The Caller’s coverage has come to mirror Daily Caller co-founder Tucker Carlson’s campaign against Israel. But Carlson isn’t the story. The outlet is.
How I Measured It
I archived every Daily Caller article mentioning Israel published from January 2022 through October 22, 2026. That’s 2,617 unique URLs, nearly 10,000,000 characters of written text. My analysis identified 41 documented examples.
The test was simple. Does the piece foreground Israeli influence, divided loyalties, attacks on Israel’s supporters, or the alliance as an American burden, in its headline, its opening or its sustained focus? Attributed interviews and polling count, because editors choose which remarks become headlines, which interviews to pursue and which themes deserve repeated attention. Each piece was counted once.
The Frame
Read the 41 examples side by side and three themes emerge:
Israel is cast as a hidden hand steering American policy.
Israel is cast as a burden draining American resources.
And pro-Israel Americans are cast as people whose loyalty is in question.
The first theme runs through the headlines. A Trump interview became “Trump Acknowledges Israel Is Losing Control Of Congress.” A poll became “Israel Influences US Foreign Policy Too Much.” An unpublished intelligence document, attributed to another outlet, became a story about how Israel is seeking to make defense ties with the US hard to undo. Christian outreach funded by Israel became “Israel Could Be Propagandizing Christians At A Church Near You.”
The second theme turns the alliance into a bill. The Caller reported that America used more interceptors to defend Israel than Israel did itself, that the Iran war is bleeding the Pentagon dry, and that defense cooperation amounts to a “military-industrial complex merger with foreign country.” Polling was selected to show the war tanking Americans’ view of Israel as an ally, and that only one group still views Israel favorably amid reports they dragged US into war.
The third theme is the most corrosive. Scott Morefield declared that you can be Israel-First or America-First, but you can’t be both. Mary Rooke attacked Lindsey Graham’s war advocacy and concluded that an elected official should not profess loyalty to a foreign country over Americans. The Caller asked “Who Is The ‘Israel First’ Spy Who Met With Mike Huckabee?” and John Loftus followed with a demand that Huckabee resign.
Attributing the argument to someone else doesn’t erase the agenda. Put enough stories about Israeli control, lobbying pressure and compromised loyalties in front of readers, and the cumulative message the Caller is trying to promote becomes unmistakable.
From Dabbling to a Beat
The early dabbling was already ugly. In April 2025, Loftus described Americans questioning pro-Israel media narratives and politicians taking AIPAC money. He opened with Theo Von saying America felt “owned by Israel” and concluded that people sharing Von’s concerns had good reason to ask questions. In my analysis, it was the only example before the twelve-day war.
That war supplied the next opening. On June 26, 2025, two days after the fighting ended, the Caller published an exclusive about AIPAC recruiting a challenger to Thomas Massie. The theme persisted through the autumn. Geoffrey Ingersoll wrote about Israel, the media and Bari Weiss, calling Weiss a “jihadi.”
Then came the Iran war, and the trickle became a flood.
Since the war began on February 28, 2026, I documented 34 examples, more than five times the number from the eight months before it. On March 3, Ingersoll published a newsletter headlined “US On Iran War: The Jews Made Me Do It.” Its text presented Israeli pressure as the simplest explanation for the war.
From there, the coverage spread to every corner of the war. Election coverage described an Israel Lobby “funding spigot” aimed at Massie, and Morefield portrayed Massie’s primary defeat as a campaign by entrenched interests. Roger Koopman cast Israel as an entangling alliance. Ashley Brasfield framed an Israeli-American commentator’s criticism of JD Vance through allegations of foreign interference.
September and October pushed further. Avi Kumar argued that America cannot continue as Israel’s shield at the United Nations. He later portrayed Israel’s non-Jewish supporters as a disparate coalition of fringe factions. On October 19, Loftus presented Netanyahu’s interview with Mark Levin as an attempt to drag the US even deeper into the Iran war, a reading that appeared in the Caller’s own headline.
The Editors Set the Tone
This escalation didn’t happen beneath the masthead. It happened at the top of it. Amber Duke announced her promotion to editor-in-chief on March 3, 2026. Two weeks later, she defended Carlson and recounted his warning about Israeli influence. In July, she praised JD Vance for getting honest about Israeli influence.
In April 2026, Matt Keener celebrated Carlson as a truth-teller while portraying pro-Israel conservatives as betraying MAGA. On September 21, Morefield approvingly invoked Norman Finkelstein’s appearance on Carlson’s program, repeating his allegation about a “Jewish supremacist billionaire class.” He portrayed the campaign against antisemitism as a weapon serving Israel.
It’s in the News Pages, Too
Opinion writers are paid to have opinions. The news pages are supposed to be different. But in the Daily Caller, they aren’t. In July 2026, a Caller news story branded critics of the Iran-linked Quincy Institute as “Israel Firsters” conducting a “smear campaign.”
In October 2026, Caller news coverage of an alleged CIA file on Israel repeated an anonymous source’s claims that America is propping up a country that “dragged us into a war we’re losing, a country that spies on us.”
Who Owns It, Who Pays for It
Neil Patel is the Caller’s co-founder, majority owner and publisher, chairman and co-founder of the Daily Caller News Foundation, and co-founder of Tucker Carlson Network. Carlson sold his Caller stake in 2020, but Patel remains a direct business bridge between the two operations.
The nonprofit supplies reporting republished by the Caller. Its 2024 return lists approximately $4.49 million in revenue and $4.51 million in contributions. DonorsTrust’s filings show $3.65 million in grants to the foundation across 2021–2024, including $1.801 million in 2024 alone, according to grant records.
From Daily Caller to Daily Groyper
For years, the Daily Caller earned a reputation for accurate, fair coverage of Israel. Some readers still hold onto that reputation. But the proof is in the pudding, and the pudding is 41 examples deep. That reputation is no longer true. The outlet that once covered Israel straight now sells its readers hidden hands, divided loyalties and Israeli influence.
The Daily Caller is gone. Welcome to the Daily Groyper.
This article was written with the help of A.I.
F*CK the Daily Groyper America, a Tucker Carlson slushbag studio that are Anti-Semitic and Anti-Zionist left-wing scum. 🇺🇸🙏